| Stellar
Work 4 |
Planetary
Power 3 |
Asteroid 2 |
Crater 1 |
| The questions are
thoughtful and well-written. The PowerPoint is visually appealing, and
the oral presentation is outstanding. |
The questions are
mainly thoughtful, the PowerPoint is good, and the oral presentation is
also good. |
Some of the
questions are acceptable while some may be lacking in content or lack
accuracy. The PowerPoint may reflect lack of effort or be incomplete. |
There is little or
no evidence of learning about the Solar System or celestial bodies.
Work may be incomplete or missing. |
| I
believe my Galaxy Jeopardy Presentation has earned a grade of |
|||
| Stellar
Work 4 |
Planetary
Power 3 |
Asteroid 2 |
CraCrater 1 |
| The essay is
clearly persuasive, articulate, and creative. The writing is focused,
fluent, with good use of vocabulary, strong supporting evidence, and
has depth. |
The essay is
clearly persuasive, has focus and gives supporting evidence. |
There is evidence
given for the need for the show, but the thesis statement may be
lacking clarity or missing. The writing may lack focus. |
The essay is
missing or lacks evidence of effort or learning. |
| I believe my Galaxy Jeopardy Essay has earned a
grade of: |
|||
| Execturive
Producer 4+ |
Host 3+ |
Contestant 3 |
Lost
in Space 2 |
Black
Hole 1 |
| BOTH the
Answer/Question PowerPoint slide show and Essay were outstanding in
factual content, depth, creativity, and visual and oral presentations. |
The PowerPoint
Answer/question was good and the Essay was articulate. The oral
presentation was exemplary. |
The PowerPoint
answer/Question show was good. It was clearly evident that the
applicant was very knowledgeable about the Solar System and beyond. |
Some of the
required material was evident, but there were some missing items or the
work was sloppy or careless. |
Work is lacking in
basic information or missing. (You can't take chances in space.) |
| I
believe my Galaxy Jeopardy Essay has earned a grade of: |
||||